Debates over factual accuracy aside, is the article not at least effective at tearing open the absurdity of our own schizophrenic relations to data? Assuming the propositions made here to be literal and not post-ironic rhetoric seems to me a shallow reading.
Debates over factual accuracy aside, is the article not at least effective at tearing open the absurdity of our own schizophrenic relations to data? Assuming the propositions made here to be literal and not post-ironic rhetoric seems to me a shallow reading.